Cybersecurity hardening
All critical findings closed within 90 days, with evidence the auditor accepts. Prioritised remediation, not a 140-page report and an invoice.
30 minutes · no obligation · written scope estimate
100%
Critical findings closed
0
Audit findings at re-review
24/7
SOC monitoring available
Overview
Most organisations that call us have already had an assessment. What they do not have is a prioritised plan, an owner per finding, and evidence in a form the auditor will accept.
We take the existing findings, rank them by real exploitability against your environment rather than by generic severity, and work them down with your team.
What we actually fix
Three problems, in the words clients use when they describe them to us.
The problem
“The assessment produced 140 findings and no plan.”
What we do
Re-ranked by exploitability in your actual environment, grouped into work packages with an owner and a date each.
Result
100% critical closed
The problem
“We close findings and the next audit reopens them.”
What we do
Remediation at the control level with monitoring that detects drift, rather than one-off fixes that decay.
Result
90 day close
The problem
“Our evidence pack takes three weeks to assemble each cycle.”
What we do
Evidence collection automated into the platform, so the pack is generated rather than assembled.
Result
Automated evidence
What you get
Against your environment, not a generic CVSS score.
Findings without an owner do not close. We assign both.
Monitoring that catches a control decaying, not just a control missing.
The audit pack builds itself from the platform.
24/7 monitoring against a written SLA if you want us to run it.
ISO 27001, SOC 2, or the regulator's framework — mapped once, reported many times.
How we work
Durations are medians. Your assessment turns them into dates.
Two weeks inside your current environment with the people who run it, not a questionnaire.
Target state and a sequence that proves the risky parts first, signed off before build.
Increments demonstrated to your process owners every two weeks rather than reported on.
Handover with runbooks, or transition to our managed service against a written SLA.
Proof
A cloud programme had stalled twice on the regulator’s data-residency and evidence requirements.
3days
Month-end close
46%
Faster customs clearance
They gave us a fixed go-live date in week two and hit it. What I actually valued was that the handover documentation was good enough that my team ran the second plant rollout themselves.
Nguyen Thi Lan
Chief Financial Officer, Trakhon Industrial
3days
Month-end close, down from 11
By capability
Each has its own page with scope, process, deliverables, and price signal.
Deploy on a Friday without anyone losing sleep.
Close the findings before the auditor arrives.
Capacity sized for what you actually run.
A decision you can defend to your board.
FAQ
We do not. We think the party remediating should not be the party assessing, and auditors increasingly agree. We work from your existing test or introduce you to an independent firm.
That is the usual starting point. We re-rank it by exploitability in your environment, which typically moves a third of the "critical" items down and a handful of "medium" items up.
Then the remediation plan has to be built around what your infrastructure team can realistically absorb, and the honest version of that plan is longer than 90 days for everything but the criticals. We will show you both versions.
Hardening closes technical findings. Certification also needs policy, process, and management-system evidence. We say plainly which of the three you are missing before you commit to a date with a certification body.
Next step
An engineer, thirty minutes, and a straight answer about whether this is the right approach for you.
No sales sequence — one reply from an engineer.